"What is a Progressive Muslim?"
The question keeps coming up. "Why say ‘Progressive Islam’?" "What is a ‘Progressive Muslim’?" "What is a ‘Moderate Muslim’?" Someone asked again, late last week—in an email. I have replied to questions like this before. And I keep replying, because I think it is very, very important to keep talking to each other—as Muslims, and as human beings. Here’s what I wrote in reply:
What is an emotional Muslim? Or a Muslim who is very military in his thinking? Was there a difference between the attitude and style of practising Islam by Umar Ibn Al Khattab and Salman Farsi and, say, Ali Ibn Abi Talib? Before Umar converted, everyone—including The Prophet—prayed in secret. But once Umar became a Muslim, he insisted they pray jamaath in public in the Kaaba’s "Haram", or sanctuary. He would not practise his faith in secret or compromise on being open and "out" as a Muslim. Were some of these people "regular Muslims" and others not?
There is one universally applicable Islam. But it is a comprehensive "deen", a complete way of existing in this world. It is "jaama’e" (comprehensive) and has a complete code for every human being in every place and time. Each of us understands it and adopts it as a function of our respective personalities, temperaments, and circumstances.
For example, ALL of us cannot practise the rules, principles and attitudes The Prophet transmitted for seeking revenge, and at the same time those for forgiveness. That’s what makes us each unique and different. There are those that choose not to forgive everything but seek revenge. If they do it in accordance with Islamic principles, they are still "regular" Muslims. And those that choose to forgive, Allah has said they get hasanaat and sawaab for that—and are also regular Muslims. But they are not the same kind of Muslim. And they can disagree on which path is better—but it will be a disagreement on what is best for a specific Muslim to do at a specific time and place. And lead to very different ways of practising the same, universal, religion.
We need to build bridges and work together—the Qur’an says "hold onto the rope of Allah as a group" but also tells us that HE made us each different. It is when people start saying that anyone who thinks he or she is a "progressive" Muslim, or a "spiritualist" versus a "conservative" one; or one who has great regard for the Hadith versus one who loves the Qur’an so much he has no time for the Hadith is, and so on; when one says that one is wrong and should not believe what they believe; it is one who tries to get everyone to conform to one way—whether progressive or conservative— who is sowing discord and wants to challenge Islam or rip it up. And that is the root of fitna in the community.
What do YOU think of people who go against all the millineum and half of traditional Islamic practice and change their greetings, and stand outside the community and declare Jihad as individuals?
If I had wanted to live on the crumbs of those who hate Islam, I could very easily have written a book like Irshad Manji or someone and made milions in the last 6 years. But it is us who speak of moderation and don’t milk either perceived and real oppression AGAINST Muslims OR perceived and real oppression BY Muslims that get crumbs in terms of attention and so on by anti-Muslims OR by Muslims
Thanks for your email, though. I hope you keep in touch. We should be able to learn from each other. And I sincerely take your email as a reminder that whatever way we choose to live up to Islam, we have to keep reminding ourselves that we are all part of one faith community and should never close the doors on anyone within that community because of how they practise that faith.
Post Script: I posted that on my blog yesterday. And then, today, I am faced the question:
What does one do when a site one doesn’t really agree with on a principled level links to you/quotes you?
I have to say, it is reassuring that a group that is so far in the direction of being against religion—correct me if I am wrong—found one of my posts to be something they wanted their readers to read. It’s quite a compliment.
Technorati tags applicable to this post: Moderate Muslims – Progressive Muslims – Former Muslims
- iFaqeer's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
First you said: There is one
First you said:
There is one universally applicable Islam.
And then:
But they are not the same kind of Muslim. And they can disagree on which path is better—but it will be a disagreement on what is best for a specific Muslim to do at a specific time and place. And lead to very different ways of practising the same, universal, religion.
The thing is, that first statement is always going to get you in trouble. It just provides fuel to the furnace of conservative orthodoxy which likes to view everyone else as wrong or misguided.
It is natural on one level to believe that there is only one truth (that’s why Plato thought that way). It’s an assumption which simplifies the difficult abstractions and debates inherent in faith. But that’s an abstract and intangible unity of truth. In the world of everyday life, there are as many versions of the truth as there are people, since everyone has a different viewpoint.
stanley g ifaqeer, first
stanley g
ifaqeer,
first of all, chill out a little bit. you get argument because most individuals of a belief system fancy theirselves as "experts on their religion". they like to argue. most of those arguments are based in passion rather than logic. i hear what you are saying because it is my experience that most believers practice the word of man. no matter the religion, the message is tolerence and the protection of those who can’t protect themselves. the quran states itself to be the "criterion" by which we live our lives in this world. everything else is just opinion, including my own